Theoretical and empirical results for recovery from multiple measurements
E. van den Berg, M. P. Friedlander. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 56(5):2516–2527,
2010.
[abs]
[bib]
[Code & Data]
[DOI]
The joint-sparse recovery problem aims to recover, from sets of compressed measurements, unknown sparse matrices with nonzero entries restricted to a subset of rows. This is an extension of the single-measurement-vector (SMV) problem widely studied in compressed sensing. We analyze the recovery properties for two types of recovery algorithms. First, we show that recovery using sum-of-norm minimization cannot exceed the uniform recovery rate of sequential SMV using L1 minimization, and that there are problems that can be solved with one approach but not with the other. Second, we analyze the performance of the ReMBo algorithm [M. Mishali and Y. Eldar, IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc., 56 (2008)] in combination with L1 minimization, and show how recovery improves as more measurements are taken. From this analysis it follows that having more measurements than number of nonzero rows does not improve the potential theoretical recovery rate.
@article{Berg2010Theoretical,
Author = {E. van den Berg and M. P. Friedlander},
Year = {2010},
Month = {May},
Journal = {IEEE Transactions on Information Theory},
Number = {5},
Volume = {56},
Pages = {2516-2527},
Doi = {10.1109/tit.2010.2043876},
Title = {Theoretical and empirical results for recovery from multiple measurements}
}